Conduct Theory
This hypothesis clarifies the viability of initiative. As per this hypothesis, authority has two characteristics i.e., starting construction and thought. These characteristics are tried with higher and lower levels with appropriate crossing point of one another.
Starting Structure
It is the level up to which a pioneer is task situated and coordinates the representative towards accomplishing an objective. For this situation, the pioneer gives guidance, makes arrangement and timetables work exercises.
Thought
It is the level up to which a pioneer is worried about the sub-ordinates, thoughts and emotions. Obliging pioneers are neighborly, they show worry for sub-ordinates' prosperity and fulfillment.
This sort of administration is accomplished by execution and is discovered to be successful. In any case, it isn't the most ideal path as situational factors are not contemplated.
Possibility Theory
As indicated by this hypothesis, propounded by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, accepts the viability of a pioneer is reliant on the activity or preparation of his devotees. By status we mean the degree to which the devotees are capable and ready to accomplish the objective.
This hypothesis is clarified based on four cases.
- Case 1 − in the event that one, we have high relationship conduct and low assignment conduct. The pioneer rouses the devotees and helps in dynamic. Very little efficiency can be found for this situation however the feeling of fellowship is high.
- Case 2 − on the off chance that two, we have high relationship conduct just as high undertaking conduct. In this mix, the pioneer clarifies the choice and assists with building certainty of the representatives. For this situation, efficiency just as faithfulness towards the pioneer is more.
- Case 3 − in the event that three, we have a blend of low relationship conduct and low errand conduct. Here we see that the pioneer assigns the obligation of dynamic to the devotees. For this situation, there is helpless correspondence just as helpless creation.
- Case 4 − Here we manage a mix of low relationship conduct and high errand conduct. The pioneer provides explicit guidance and oversees the presentation. This hypothesis is successful just if the pioneers change their style regardless of the status of the adherents.